Initial reaction – Maple is a strong contender for best in class

#7
by sfrav - opened

This is quite impressive.

After some light testing on code and science prompts, my reflections were that it is fast (>3x of GPT-OSS), concise but sufficient reasoning length, better at instruction following than other models this size and able to produce good quality outputs (code generation wasn't always optimal – but neither are leading lab models of 50-100x the size).

Functionality aside, it would be interesting to know about architectual decisions made, ethical stance on the training data that was used and a bit about the good folk that have been laboring away at this.

sfrav changed discussion title from Initial reaction – Maple wins to Initial reaction – Maple is a strong contender for best in class

Sign up or log in to comment