LensBench / README.md
zhshj0110's picture
Sync GPT-6-Astra LensBench results and metric descriptions
9e94ddf verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
7.47 kB
metadata
pretty_name: LensBench
language:
  - en
license: apache-2.0
task_categories:
  - image-segmentation
tags:
  - image
  - text
  - referring-expression-segmentation
  - visual-grounding
  - benchmark
size_categories:
  - 1K<n<10K
configs:
  - config_name: default
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: test.parquet

LensBench

LensBench is a segmentation benchmark for explicit and implicit instructions across general, aerial, driving, and panoramic images. It contains 1,200 human-reviewed paired evaluation units and 4,800 instruction-level samples.

Paper · Project page · Code · Model

Dataset design

Each evaluation unit has four instructions crossing single/multiple targets with explicit/implicit wording. For a given target-cardinality condition, both wordings share the same target mask. Multiple targets are represented by their union mask. Targets and masks are fixed before instruction synthesis, followed by automated consistency checks and human review of each complete unit.

Domain Paired units Explicit / single Explicit / multiple Implicit / single Implicit / multiple Total samples
General 300 300 300 300 300 1,200
Aerial 300 300 300 300 300 1,200
Driving 300 300 300 300 300 1,200
Panoramic 300 300 300 300 300 1,200
Total 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 4,800

The release provides a single test split for evaluation.

Files and fields

LensBench/
├── README.md
└── test.parquet

Images are embedded in the Parquet file; no separate image download is needed.

Field Type Description
index int64 Unique instruction-level sample index; not a paired-unit identifier.
image Hugging Face Image Embedded image bytes and original filename; decoded to a PIL image by datasets.
instruction string English instruction describing the segmentation target.
segmentation struct COCO compressed RLE with size and counts.
segmentation.size list of int32 Mask dimensions in [height, width] order.
segmentation.counts string Compressed COCO RLE counts; encode as ASCII bytes before decoding with pycocotools.
domain string general, aerial, driving, or panoramic.
explicitness string explicit or implicit.
cardinality string single or multiple.

The release does not contain a bounding-box field. When a box is needed, derive it from the target mask; for multiple targets, use the enclosing box of the union mask.

Quick start

Install the loading and mask-decoding dependencies:

pip install datasets pillow pycocotools huggingface_hub

Load the dataset and decode the first target mask:

from datasets import load_dataset
from pycocotools import mask as mask_utils


dataset = load_dataset("SeerRay-Lab/LensBench", split="test")
sample = dataset[0]
image = sample["image"]
rle = {
    "size": sample["segmentation"]["size"],
    "counts": sample["segmentation"]["counts"].encode("ascii"),
}
mask = mask_utils.decode(rle)

assert mask.shape == (image.height, image.width)
print(sample["instruction"])
print(sample["domain"], sample["explicitness"], sample["cardinality"])
print(image.size, mask.shape)

To download the release and load it locally:

hf download SeerRay-Lab/LensBench --repo-type dataset --local-dir LensBench
from datasets import load_dataset


dataset = load_dataset(
    "parquet", data_files={"test": "LensBench/test.parquet"}, split="test"
)
implicit_samples = dataset.filter(lambda sample: sample["explicitness"] == "implicit")

Evaluation

The original baseline results are reported in Table 7 in Section 4.3 of the Xiaomi-Lens-0 Technical Report (arXiv v1). The table below also includes the subsequently added GPT-6-Astra results and is synchronized with the project results.

Marginal results pool single and multiple targets. Each cell reports cIoU / [email protected] (%, higher is better). Bold marks the best score, and underlining marks the second-best score for each metric and column, including ties.

Method Explicit Implicit General Aerial Driving Panoramic
GPT-6-Astra 72.6 / 86.3 71.0 / 84.0 74.1 / 86.2 61.7 / 76.9 77.6 / 89.0 68.9 / 88.3
GPT-5.6-Sol 63.8 / 73.2 61.2 / 70.0 68.4 / 67.9 42.2 / 58.5 68.4 / 81.8 57.1 / 78.3
Gemini-3.6-Flash 61.4 / 74.5 61.0 / 70.3 63.6 / 65.8 50.1 / 62.5 66.8 / 81.0 60.8 / 80.3
MiMo-V2.5 51.4 / 52.2 47.4 / 46.8 54.2 / 45.2 32.6 / 38.6 50.5 / 52.8 45.4 / 61.4
Seed-2.1-Pro 62.1 / 70.2 55.9 / 64.5 60.6 / 56.7 50.1 / 58.5 66.8 / 77.4 59.9 / 76.7
Qwen3.8-Max 67.6 / 69.2 64.5 / 63.8 74.2 / 79.7 33.5 / 62.5 58.0 / 57.7 60.8 / 66.2
Kimi-K3 29.4 / 39.1 28.3 / 33.0 38.5 / 26.1 13.8 / 44.9 47.2 / 31.1 13.4 / 42.1
GLM-5.3-Flash 44.3 / 37.5 43.5 / 33.3 48.9 / 26.3 28.0 / 33.4 51.6 / 47.5 30.6 / 34.4
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp 41.8 / 30.7 41.1 / 27.3 46.1 / 28.1 25.9 / 28.9 43.9 / 27.9 32.8 / 31.0
SAM 3 17.3 / 38.1 15.4 / 19.5 23.8 / 24.8 4.3 / 27.3 27.7 / 35.1 11.1 / 27.9
Xiaomi-Lens-04B 71.4 / 85.0 54.7 / 70.0 63.9 / 79.1 57.1 / 79.6 68.6 / 79.4 62.3 / 72.1

GPT-6-Astra leads cIoU on explicit and implicit instructions and in aerial, driving, and panoramic imagery. Qwen3.8-Max leads cIoU in general imagery (74.2). Xiaomi-Lens-0 ranks second on both explicit-instruction metrics and on cIoU in aerial, driving, and panoramic imagery, and leads aerial [email protected] (79.6). Implicit instructions remain challenging: cIoU drops from 71.4 to 54.7, while [email protected] drops from 85.0 to 70.0. The gap is largest for multiple targets in panoramic scenes, where cIoU falls from 71.8 to 48.9 and [email protected] from 81.3 to 48.7.

See the paper and project results for the evaluation protocol and comparisons. Preserve the domain, explicitness, and cardinality labels when reporting subgroup results.

License

The images and annotations in this release are licensed under the Apache License 2.0.

Citation

If you use LensBench, please cite:

@misc{xiaomilens0,
  title         = {Xiaomi-Lens-0 Technical Report},
  author        = {Pei Fu and Yike Liu and Yue Sun and Hanmo Wang and
                   Xiuwen Xi and Ruoceng Zhang and Shaojie Zhang and Tingwei Huang and
                   Chao Jiang and Hang Li and Bingrui Liu and Zhenbo Luo and
                   Heng Qu and Changjian Xu and Ming Xu and Jian Luan},
  year          = {2026},
  eprint        = {2610.23279},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  primaryClass  = {cs.CV},
  url           = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23279}
}