LiveMACE: Process-Aware Evaluation of LLM Agent Capabilities in Evolving Markets
Abstract
LiveMACEBench evaluates persistent LLM agents in live financial markets using decision traces to reveal gaps between outcomes and underlying capabilities.
Evaluating agents by outcomes alone can obscure the capabilities that produce them. This problem is especially pronounced in evolving environments, where outcomes reflect a closed-loop interaction between agent behavior and changing external conditions. We introduce LiveMACEBench, a process-aware benchmark that uses live financial markets as a naturally evolving testbed for persistent LLM agents. Five frontier LLMs operate along continuous trajectories under matched Tool Use, Persistent Memory, Rule Following, and Multi-Agent Collaboration configurations. We evaluate them through both realized outcomes and mechanism-specific diagnostics derived from complete decision traces. Across 30 days of live evaluation, we find a pronounced outcome-capability gap: realized returns often diverge from capability-specific measurements, and similar outcomes can arise from markedly different patterns of mechanism use. Trace-level diagnostics further expose distinct bottlenecks across capabilities, demonstrating that mechanism access, effective mechanism use, and downstream performance are not interchangeable measures of agent capability. LiveMACEBench makes this distinction measurable, turning live markets from a performance leaderboard into a diagnostic environment for agent capability
Community
We introduce LiveMACE, a benchmark that uses live financial markets to evaluate LLM agent capabilities. Static benchmark questions can enter training data; future market events have yet to occur. This makes evolving markets a natural environment for testing how agents act under genuinely new conditions.
However, realized returns alone do not characterize an agent’s capabilities: they reflect both evolving market conditions and multiple aspects of agent behavior. LiveMACE combines simulated trading in cryptocurrency and US-equity markets with process-aware evaluation of four capabilities: tool use, persistent memory, rule following, and multi-agent collaboration. It records agents’ decisions and interactions, then evaluates the traces behind their outcomes.
Across five frontier LLMs and 30 days of live evaluation, we find an outcome–capability gap: higher returns do not consistently imply stronger capabilities, and similar returns can arise from different patterns of mechanism use. Our goal is to make live markets useful as an evaluation environment for agents, with measurements that go beyond the return leaderboard.
The framework is open source, and we welcome feedback on evaluating persistent agents in evolving environments.
This is an automated message from the ResearchStudio team.
We created an interactive ResearchStudio Reel for this paper. It includes a visual poster, a video, and a blog, all available for download in editable formats.
Open the ResearchStudio Reel →
Download all files from Hugging Face
Please give this comment a thumbs up if you find the Reel helpful!
Want to explore or create Reels for more papers? Visit the ResearchStudio demo.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Beyond Endpoint Performance: Process-Level Evaluation of Self-Evolving Agents (2026)
- openJiuwen: Beyond Static Harnesses for Long-Horizon Coding Agents (2026)
- LiveOption: Evaluating LLM Agents in Structured Option Trading with Nonlinear Payoffs (2026)
- EvoHarnessBench: Can Your Agents Keep Pace with an Evolving Harness? (2026)
- Agentic Quantitative Trading: A Survey of Workflows, Systems, and Evaluation (2026)
- PILOT in the Loop: Live Self-Improvement for Long-Horizon Agents (2026)
- SEABench: Benchmarking Endogenous Misalignment In Self-Evolving Agents (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.09872 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 1
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper
