Better Retrieval, Worse Robustness:How Multi-hop RAG Amplifies Upstream ASR Errors
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation extensions amplify automatic speech recognition errors in spoken multi-hop question answering, primarily through corrupted query entities.
Speech-based applications pass spoken queries through automatic speech recognition (ASR) before any retrieval module, so ASR errors enter the pipeline as a fixed upstream constraint. We empirically test whether two extensions to standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), entity-graph linking and iterative reformulation, absorb or amplify these errors. Using four English accents synthesized through neural TTS, we evaluate four RAG configurations on three multi-hop QA benchmarks (HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA and MuSiQue) against a clean-text oracle. Although the structurally richer configurations generally retain higher absolute F1 under ASR input, both extensions amplify the error: the F1 gap from clean text to the highest-WER accent is 36-67% larger under their combination than under naive dense retrieval, on all three benchmarks. The dominant failure mode is corruption of one or more query entities, accounting for 87-96% of degradation cases on 2WikiMultiHopQA across all four methods. Two lightweight surface-form mitigations leave most of the gap intact, indicating that downstream retrieval structure amplifies remaining entity errors. We release code and data at https://github.com/ZhenghuaBao/spoken-multihop-rag .
Community
Speech interfaces put ASR in front of retrieval, so the query a RAG system sees is already corrupted. We test whether the standard multi-hop methods, entity-graph linking and iterative reformulation, absorb that corruption or amplify it.
The findings suggest that they amplify it. The structurally richer configurations generally reach higher absolute F1 under ASR input, but they give up more of their clean-text advantage: the gap from clean text to the highest-WER accent is 36-67% larger under IRCoT+HippoRAG2 than under naive dense retrieval, on all three benchmarks. Corruption of one or more query entities is the dominant failure mode, accounting for 87-96% of degradation cases on 2WikiMultiHopQA across all four methods.
Two lightweight surface-form mitigations, N-best decoding and phonetic entity correction, leave most of the gap intact, which points at retrieval structure rather than transcription surface form.
We release the code and a transcript dataset covering 3 multi-hop QA benchmarks x 4 English accents (3,000 questions, 12,000 rows).
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- DynaKRAG: A Unified Framework for Learnable Evidence Control in Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation (2026)
- RAGuard: A Layered Defense Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems Against Data Poisoning (2026)
- When Do Multimodal and Graph-Augmented RAG Help? A Controlled Evaluation for Document Question Answering (2026)
- A Triple-Robustness Analysis of Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-Hop Requirements Traceability (2026)
- Dual-Confidence Contrastive Decoding for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (2026)
- Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Token Co-occurrence Graphs (2026)
- Best-of-$N$ TTS Evaluation is Confounded by ASR Family Alignment (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2608.22872 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper