AgentLens: Production-Assessed Trajectory Reviews for Coding Agent Evaluation
Abstract
We present AgentLens, a production-assessed benchmark for interactive code agents. Most code-agent benchmarks reduce a run to a single bit -- did the task pass? -- but the people who actually use these agents experience the entire trajectory: how the agent follows instructions, uses its tools, verifies its own work, recovers from mistakes, and talks to them along the way. AgentLens evaluates that whole trajectory. It pairs formal verification, where an objective check exists, with LLM-written trajectory reviews and side-by-side comparisons, so that each run yields a readable explanation of why the score is what it is. This makes AgentLens useful for more than ranking models: we use it to diagnose model behavior, compare successive versions of our own agent, and catch product regressions in a nightly evaluation pipeline. We release the benchmark as open source at https://github.com/agent-lens/agent-lens-bench.
Community
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- SWE-Together: Evaluating Coding Agents in Interactive User Sessions (2026)
- EvoCode-Bench: Evaluating Coding Agents in Multi-Turn Iterative Interactions (2026)
- What Resolve Rate Hides: Trajectory Structure Diagnostics for Coding Agents (2026)
- AgenticVBench: Can AI Agents Complete Real-World Post-Production Tasks? (2026)
- AgentAtlas: Beyond Outcome Leaderboards for LLM Agents (2026)
- STAGE-Claw: Automated State-based Agent Benchmarking for Realistic Scenarios (2026)
- SWE-INTERACT: Reimagining SWE Benchmarks as User-Driven Long-Horizon Coding Sessions (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper